Naturally, the individual must have sufficient funds with which to pay the premium. Now, Plutarch, on the other hand, was very satisfied with the technology of the roads and how nice they are in document six.
If you had insured yourself, all this confusion could have been averted. Documents 5 and 7 show two Roman upper classman opposed to engineering because they believe discoverers and craftsment deficiency wisdom and enlightenment. One does not travel through Rome, one travels to it. Document 6 shows Plutarch.
Although Han insisted the praiseful perspective, there were still some imperfect aspects of the technology while Roman regarded the tool manufacturing is a vulgar profession of the career, both are the negative point toward the technology.
The bulk of attitude towards engineering during the Han dynasty and Roman Empire reasonably was positive. Then the government raised prices on iron and some of the poor had to digress to older technology.
As written by Yang Xiong in 15 BCE, the belt drive was first used for a quilling device which wound silk fibers onto the bobbins of weaver shuttles. Similarly, Seneca of Doc 7 illustrate the same idea, the smart people do not work with their hands and technology is less important for him.
Agriculturists and craftsman were one of the largest classes in the Han Empire. The roads were kept in very good condition that allowed them to travel throughout their entire empire.
Get Full Essay Get access to this section to get all help you need with your essay and educational issues. Any traveler, trekking through Rome would know the might and ingenuity of Rome by their impressive roads and waterways.
Furnaces which are able to convert iron ore into pig iron and later into cast iron were operational in China during the Han dynasty period. Han was praiseful towards its achievements and progression of the technology, while few Roman high officials depicted that the utilizing technology is favorable.
Looking over the paperss. Huan Tan, a Han philosopher, wrote about the invention of the pestle and mortar and its evolution with the addition of animals and water power, and Huan Guan, a Han government official, speaks of the processes of iron foundry work and salt making.
Summary The Han Dynasty and the Roman Empire were both very powerful nations with very different attitudes toward technology. This document would be useful because that the upper class did not show interest about the technology that a commoner might have used such as hand tools and other common working items.
Therefore, their attitudes toward technology was positive… as long as it was created by a man higher up in society. It is shown that both authorities and philosophers see a benefit of engineering in society. Because philosophers are trained to think this way, they would be able to create tools and new innovations in technology that could completely change how technology was viewed, leading their empires to greater and greater heights.
Where Han technology focused on the individual, Rome technology focused on the state. An improvement of the simple lever -and- fulcrum tilt hammer device operated by one's foot, the hydraulic-powered trip hammer used for pounding, decorticatingand polishing grain was first mentioned in the Han dictionary Jijiupian of 40 BCE.
That is, it does not provide primary benefits that are tied, for example, to the amount of a m…edical expense. Can you have health insurance? On the other manus. His point of view is that he feels that the minds that did create the current technological advances in tools were nimble and sharp, but not great nor elevated.
In Document 1 it shows that technology was not just used as a luxury, but was used a necessary way to help prevent disaster. More essays like this: The earliest specimens of cast iron found in China date to the 5th century BCE during the late Spring and Autumn periodyet the oldest discovered blast furnaces date to the 3rd century BCE and the majority date to the period after Emperor Wu of Han r.Both Han and Rome had positive attitudes towards technology.
This was the “least acceptable” thesis. Acceptable Throughout China there was a majority appreciation of technological advancement with a few against it, while in the Roman empire, the view was split between support and pessimism. While not especially strong, this thesis meets all the criteria specified on the left.
• The Han dynasty emphasized. Attitudes Towards Technology in the Han and Roman Empires DBQ 2 Technology is always changing. New ideas are being introduced, and innovations to current technologies are always taking place. Some may see changes in technology as a vital and helpful thing, while others may oppose.
Han and Roman attitudes towards technology in the late BCE and early CE pointed towards two main categories, positive and negative. The Majority of the documents had positive attitudes towards technology because of its obvious benefits to the author’s cities.
Han and Roman Attitudes Toward Technology Essay Sample Throughout the history Han Dynasty of China and the Roman Empire were the two enormous political unities, both developing their technology well. Han was generally positive and supportive toward the technology using though Roman thought that each job has its own social dignity, therefore leading to the inferior attribute to the craftsmen and.
Attitudes Towards Technology: Han China and Roman Empire Essay Han and Roman attitudes towards technology in the late BCE and early CE pointed towards two main categories, positive and negative.
The Majority of the documents had positive attitudes towards technology because of. Two of the most powerful empires of the ancient world were the Han, in China, and the Romans, in Italy.
While both were great and powerful, Han and Roman similarities and differences in valued class, occupation, and government can be found in their attitudes toward technology.Download